190 Cal. 401
212 P 913
Decided February 13, 1923
California Supreme Court · decided 1923-02-13
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1923-02-13
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1952
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The application for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to proceed and hear the petition for distribution in this case, where money has been paid to the state treasurer under provisions of section 1737 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is denied, on the ground that petitioner's remedy is by proceeding in the superior court of Sacramento County under the provisions of section 1272a of the Code of Civil Procedure (Stats. 1917, p. 254).
*402¶2 All the Justices concurred.