Squibb v. Squibb’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2008
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 140 Cal. App. 2d 185 - Strangman v. Duke · Swan v. Walden · Fox v. Fox · 20 Cal. 2d 787 - Kachigian v. Kachigian · In Re the Estate of Fath
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he law is now clear that a statutory homestead interest does not deprive the co-tenant of the right to have the common property partitioned and sold and that the homestead right of the co-tenant in his interest in the common property is no bar to a suit for that purpose”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Coyle v. Kujaczynski
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.