Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 Cal. App. 3d 1123 - Baker v. Ramirez

190 Cal. App. 3d 1123 - Baker v. Ramirez’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
4
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably 94 Cal. App. 4th 890 - De Anza Santa Cruz Mobile Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. De Anza Santa Cruz Mobile Estates (2001), 179 Cal. App. 4th 442 - Kelly v. CB&I CONSTRUCTORS, INC. (2009)

20 state decisions

13019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc. · 101 Cal. App. 3d 858 - Heninger v. Dunn · Neff v. Ernst · Pinsky v. Sloat · 236 Cal. App. 2d 159 - Drewry v. Welch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The measure of damages for tortious injury to property is ‘the amount which will compensate for all the detriment proximately caused thereby . . . .’ (Civ. Code, § 3333.) There is no fixed rule for the measure of such damages. [Citation.] One measure is the difference between the value of the property before and after the injury. However, an alternative measure is the cost of restoring the property to its condition prior to the injury. [Citation.] Whatever measure is the most appropriate to compensate the injured party for the loss sustained in the particular case is the one which should be adopted. [Citation.] “Here, there is no impediment to replacing the orange trees and, considering the small portion of the grove which was damaged, it is reasonable to do so. Thus, the cost of restoring the grove is the most appropriate measure of damages in this case. The orange trees are valuable only because they produce valuable fruit, and their worth is a proper method of determining the damage to the grove. [Citation.]” ( 190 Cal.App.3d at p. 1137 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.