Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 F.2d 217 - Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.

Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.’s Empirical Analysis

190 F.2d 217 · 1951

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 1975
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1975 · most notably Cold Metal Process Company v. United Engineering & Foundry Company (1956), The Cold Metal Process Company and the Union National Bank of Youngstown, Ohio, Trustee v. Republic Steel Corporation, Republic Steel Corporation v. The Cold Metal Process Company and the Union National Bank of Youngstown, Ohio, Trustee (1956)

18 federal appellate · 1 district ·

220195119601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co. · Loverich v. Warner Co. · Kane v. Union of Soviet Socialist Republics · Topping v. Fry · Cold Metal Process Co. v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In substance it had been determined that United had an exclusive license from Cold Metal to make, use, and sell the four-high mills covered by the 1927 agreement and that United should pay royalties to Cold Metal in an amount to be determined by the court below.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.