Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 F.2d 238 - Audiss v. Peter Kiewit Sons Co.

Audiss v. Peter Kiewit Sons Co.’s Empirical Analysis

190 F.2d 238 · 1951

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
December 1981
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 1981

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

601951196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wilkerson v. McCarthy · Friese v. Gulbrandson · Northern Liquid Gas Co. v. Hildreth · Mast v. Illinois Cent. R. · Morrison v. Scotts Bluff County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is no exact rule or standard that can be fixed for its application”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “uncertainty in this legislative concept is intrinsic”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.