Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 F.2d 278 - Zubik v. United States

Zubik v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

190 F.2d 278 · 1951

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
December 2004
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2004

13 federal appellate · 3 district ·

80195119601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 33 U.S.C. § 409 · 33 U.S.C. § 414 · 33 U.S.C. § 415

Relies on President Managers and Company of the Monongahela Bridge Company v. United States · United States v. Atlantic Refining Co. · The Manhattan · In re Highlands Nav. Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That in his discretion, the Secretary of the Army may cause reasonable notice of such obstruction of not less than thirty days, unless the legal abandonment of the obstruction can be established in a less time, to be given by publication, addressed ‘To whom it may concern,’ in a newspaper published nearest to the locality of the obstruction, requiring the removal thereof * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It is immaterial that as a matter of hindsight it appears that the government stands to gain rather than lose by the deal. If the costs of removal exceeded the value of the barge the owner would not be liable for the difference.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.