Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 F.2d 601 - Perry v. Perry

Perry v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis

190 F.2d 601 · 1951

Citation profile

144
cited by 144 later decisions
2
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

73 federal appellate · 15 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 144 later decisions — most recently September 2011 · most notably Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Company. Federal Trade Commission v. The Superior Oil Company, Inc., a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Exxon Corporation, a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Shell Oil Company, a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Company of California, a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Mobil Oil Corporation, a Corporation (1977), Lawson Products, Inc. v. Avnet, Inc. (1986)

73 federal appellate · 15 district · 11 state decisions

5701951196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Orvis v. Higgins · Dollar v. Land · Bomeisler v. . Forster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 144 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a motion for preliminary injunction is presented to a court in advance of hearing on the merits, it is called upon to exercise its discretion ‘upon the basis of a series of estimates: the relative importance of the rights asserted and the acts sought to be enjoined, the irreparable nature of the injury allegedly flowing from denial of preliminary relief, the probability of the ultimate success or failure of the suit, the balancing of damage and convenience generally. A mere listing of the guiding considerations demonstrates their intangible nature, especially when no attempt is made at this stage to decide finally the questions raised.’ Concurring opinion in Communist Party v. McGrath, D.C., 96 F.Supp. 47, 48 .””
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(t)he granting of preliminary relief will tend to minimize any future harm until (the) suit is decided on the merits.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.