190 F.2d 82
Docket No. 268.
Docket Docket 22007.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1951-06-25
2 counsel of record
Relies on Steinberg v. Sharpe
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1951-06-25
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 1986
8 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
Morris J. Levy, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.
Fulton, Walter & Halley, New York City, Harmon Duncombe, Daniel J. O'Connell, New York City, of counsel, for defendant-appellee.
Before CHASE, CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed on opinion below. 95 F.Supp. 32.