Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 F.3d 504 - United States of America v. Darius Herrera-Ordones

United States of America v. Darius Herrera-Ordones’s Empirical Analysis

190 F.3d 504 · 1999

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
December 2016
most recently cited

24 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably United States v. Zehm (2000), United States v. Delgado-Nuñez (2002)

24 federal appellate ·

380199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (§ 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1329 (§ 279 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on San Vicente Medical Partners, Ltd. v. Orr · Berkery v. Commissioner · Woodcock v. Chemical Bank · Ansari v. Pahlavi · Rowan Cos. v. Parker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When an alien reenters the country by using an alias, or uses false identification, when his illegal presence in the United States is discovered, he is not identifiable and hence not `found.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “when the INS both discovers his presence in the United States and knows that, because of his identity and status, his presence here is illegal”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “clearly demonstrates acceptance of responsibility for his offense”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.