Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 FRD 38 - Peralta v. Cendant Corp.

Peralta v. Cendant Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Upjohn Company v. United States · Better Government Bureau, Inc. v. McGraw · Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation City of Long Beach v. Standard Oil Company of California · Polycast Technology Corp. v. Uniroyal, Inc. · Amarin Plastics, Inc. v. Maryland Cup Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “asking [a fact witness who was interviewed] explicitly about [interviewing counsel’s] legal conclusions or legal opinions that reveal [interviewing counsel's] legal strategy” and”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.