Currier v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1339 · 39 U.S.C. § 101 (Air Carriage of International Mail Act) · 39 U.S.C. § 3628 · 39 U.S.C. § 401 · 39 U.S.C. § 403 · 39 U.S.C. § 409 · 39 U.S.C. § 410
Relies on Cort v. Ash · McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyer · Heckler v. Chaney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is no waiver of immunity, no substantive legal basis and no jurisdiction over claims asserted under Postal Service regulations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Currier v. Potter“mak[ing] any undue or unreasonable discrimination among users of the mails.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Currier v. Potter“to sue and be sued in its official name.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Currier v. Potter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.