Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 Ga. App. 606 - State v. Sutherland

190 Ga. App. 606 - State v. Sutherland’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2005
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Frazier v. State · Conley v. Arnold · Lane v. State · 157 Ga. App. 704 - Davenport v. State · Nichols v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While the prosecuting officer should see that no unfair advantage is taken of the accused, yet he is not a judicial officer. Those who are required to exercise judicial functions in the case are the judge and jury. The public prosecutor is necessarily a partisan in the case. If he were compelled to proceed with the same circumspection as the judge and jury, there would be an end to the conviction of criminals.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.