Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 IND 173 - Davis v. Babb

Davis v. Babb’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
4
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently July 2009 · most notably Blue v. State (1946), Keeshin Motor Express Co. v. Glassman (1942)

45 state decisions

1401919192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re the Estate of Arnold · Snowball v. Snowball · Burkhart v. Gladish · Lamb v. Lamb · Mowry v. Norman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Such is the nature of the human mind that, when it has been habituated to the influence of another, it will yield to that influence and suffer it to have its effect, although the person in the habit of its exercise may not be present or exert it at the time an act is done. It may happen that the fruit of an evil and improper influence is born long after the influence is exerted,” (My emphasis.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In the contest of a will on the ground of undue influence the evidence required to establish the undue influence need not be of that direct, affirmative, and positive character which is required to establish a tangible physical fact. The only positive and affirmative proof required is of facts and circumstances from which the undue influence may be reasonably inferred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In determining whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury, this court will consider, not only the positive testimony of the witnesses, but also such inferences as flow naturally from established facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.