Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 IND 363 - Thompson v. State

Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
3
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2011 · most notably Callender v. State (1922), Wilson v. State (1975)

38 state decisions

1301921193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Engleman v. State · Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Morrey · Hammond, Whiting & East Chicago Electric Railway Co. v. Antonia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Merely exhibiting an affidavit to the judge, or executing it before him, is not a 'filing' of the affidavit with the judge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the warrant was not supported by 'oath or affirmation,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “was not supported by 'oath or affirmation' as required by the [Indiana] constitutional provision against unreasonable search and seizure, and was illegal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.