Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 Kan. 569 - Parsons v. Smith, Trustee

Parsons v. Smith, Trustee’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Jennings v. Murdock (1976), Meyer v. Benelli (1966)

34 state decisions

180196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Beall v. Hardie · In Re Estate of Sowder · In Re Estate of Hauck · Householter v. Householter · In Re Estate of Weidman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Moreover, we deem it right and equitable that, after having determined what would be a reasonable fee for the movants’ attorneys under the confronting facts and circumstances, it should have directed that such fees and the court costs be paid out of the corpus of the estate still in the hands of Leah Smith, trustee. [The trustee was only a stakeholder as the trust was unlawfully created.] “See, In re Estate of Sowder, 185 Kan. 74 , 340 P. 2d 907 , where it is said: “ ‘It has been held where there is ambiguity in the provisions of a will and a real controversy as to its construction, it is competent for the court to allow reasonable attorney fees out of the estate to the defeated as well as the successful party; and in connection with the same subject it has been held that under the provisions of what is now G. S. 1949, 60-3706, the district court in its discretion has authority to tax costs and allow attorney fees and to determine from what source they should be paid, as it may deem right and equitable. (In re Estate of Walton, [ 183 Kan. 238, 243 , 326 P. 2d 264 ] supra; In re Estate of Reynolds, 176 Kan. 254 , 270 P. 2d 299 ; Singer v. Taylor, 91 Kan. 190 , 137 Pac. 931 ; and Hurst v. Weaver, 75 Kan. 758, 763 , 90 Pac. 297 .)’ (p. 86.) (Emphasis supplied.) “See, also, Central Trust Co. v. Harris, 152 Kan. 296 , 300 to 304, inch, 103 P. 2d 902 .” (p. 574.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.