Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 Kan. 68 - Ater v. Culbertson

Ater v. Culbertson’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

2 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Domann v. Pence · Cain v. Steely · Stevens v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. · Rasing v. Healzer · Roberts v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may reject a part and believe a part of the testimony.”). The court sees no inseparable evidentiary link between Nurse McDonald’s testimony concerning what she learned from the in-service training and what she later told the Perrys. What Nurse McDonald had learned at in-service training is relevant in weighing her testimony about what she later told the Perrys. It is also relevant, however, in proving her knowledge and understanding of the actual surgical procedures to be used for donating body tissues. 5 . In a single sentence, St. Francis asserts”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.