Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 La. 457 - State v. Stracner

State v. Stracner’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
3
states following
May 2004
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently May 2004 · most notably 683 So. 2d 218 - State v. Strickland (1996), State v. Walker (1943)

32 state decisions

8019381940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Brown · State v. Terrell · State v. Scruggs · State v. Bouvy · State v. Daleo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is not considered proper that the defendant should be permitted to sit idly by while the judge is making an erroneous charge to the jury, take his chances upon the verdict, and, if against him, then by assignment of error or motion in arrest take advantage of it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it was not improper for the jury to take the written charge of the court into their consultation room.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.