Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 La. 586 - Tillery v. Fuller

Tillery v. Fuller’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

116
cited by 116 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

112 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 116 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably Tyson v. Spearman (1938), Knapp v. Jefferson-Plaquemines Drainage Dist. (1953)

112 state decisions

300193819401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Houghton v. Hall · Ashley Co. v. Bradford · Heirs v. Martinez · Dew v. Hammett · Bendernagel v. Foret

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[21-24] * * * A tax sale made under an assessment in which the description of the property intended to be assessed is so defective that resort must be had to evidence outside of the assessment roll in order to identify the property intended to be assessed is protected by the limitation of three years if the assessment was made in the name of the true owner, or owner of record, of the property intended to be assessed, and if the identity of the property intended to be assessed is established unmistakably by such outside evidence. (citations omitted) In such cases the identification of the property intended to be assessed may be confirmed by proof that the party in whose name the property was assessed did not own any other property in the section or other subdivision given in the assessment. * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(t)he Civil Code, in terms, forbids the making of a sale or any stipulation or agreement to affect the succession of a living person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.