Sipley v. Stickney’s Empirical Analysis
1906
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 43 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Frati v. Jannini (1917), Chelsea Industries, Inc. v. Gaffney (1983)
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 43 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. . Brady · Hansbrough v. Peck · Britton v. Turner · Crouch v. . Gutmann · Heckmann v. . Pinkney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In Metcalf on Contracts, pp. 7-9, the general doctrine is laid down that: ‘If the failure to perform the express contract be intentional, it is such bad faith that he can recover nothing.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.