190 Md. App. 595 - Abbott v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
19 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 115 · 18 U.S.C. § 43 (Animal Enterprise Protection Act of 1992) · 18 U.S.C. § 871 (Presidential Threat Protection Act of 2000) · 18 U.S.C. § 876
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Mathews v. United States · Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Co. v. United States · Nicholas v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We hold that the court must instruct the jury on a matter which is a proper subject for instructions where a timely request has been made even though that request is not totally accurate and may contain some erroneous material. To hold otherwise would be to place on the parties the responsibility for determining what the law is, a responsibility which is properly entrusted to the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Albertson v. State“if a point germane to the appeal is not adequately raised in a party's brief, the court may, and ordinarily should, decline to address it”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.