Millen v. Potter’s Empirical Analysis
1916
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited
1 district · 1 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The complainants have assented to these changes by demanding their proportion of the common stock in the company as organized, and by so doing some questions discussed in the briefs of counsel are rendered unimportant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Millen v. Potter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.