State v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably 51 Cal. 3d 437 - People v. Rodriguez (1990), Harris v. United States (1992)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Scott v. State · State v. Oppelt · Petition of Meidinger · State v. Millner · 34 Or. App. 563 - State v. Eckley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The inquiry at any probation revocation hearing is whether the purposes of rehabilitation are being achieved, and whether, by virtue of subsequent criminal conduct or evidence that the defendant’s behavior was not in compliance with the mies and objectives of his probation, the purposes of probation are best served by continued liberty or by incarceration.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““(1) A judge, magistrate, or justice of the peace who has suspended the execution of a sentence or deferred the imposition of a sentence of imprisonment under 46-18-201 or his successor is authorized in his discretion to revoke the suspension or impose sentence and order the person committed. He may also, in his discretion, order the prisoner placed under the jurisdiction of the department of institutions as provided by law or retain such jurisdiction with his court.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Rogers““A judge . . . who has suspended the execution of a sentence . . . under 46-18-201 or his successor is authorized in his discretion to revoke the suspension or impose sentence and order the person committed.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Lange
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.