¶1 Tbe defendant was found guilty by tbe jury of aiding and abetting in tbe manufacture of liquor. We think-tbe evidence objected to competent. We think there was some evidence sufficient to be submitted to tbe jury — tbe probative force was for the jury. S. v. Killian, 178 N. C., p. 753. We see no prejudicial or reversible error in tbe record.
¶2 No error.