Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 N.C. App. 653 - State v. Satanek

190 N.C. App. 653 - State v. Satanek’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

35 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 12 N.C. App. 676 - State v. Noles · 155 N.C. App. 251 - State v. Taylor · State v. Bryant · In re N.R.M. · In Re NRM

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]n appellate court necessarily conducts a statutory analysis when analyzing whether a trial court has subject matter jurisdiction in a probation revocation hearing, and thus conducts a de novo review.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When the record shows a lack of jurisdiction in the lower court, the appropriate action on the part of the appellate court is to arrest judgment or vacate any order entered without authority.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A trial court must have subject matter jurisdiction over a case in order to act in that case.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.