190 Or. App. 202 - State v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he refusal to take medication is not sufficient, by itself, to prove an inability to provide for basic personal needs”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“would likely not survive in the near future because that person is unable to provide for [her] basic needs due to a mental disorder and that person is not otherwise receiving the care necessary for health and safety”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reasonable plan for obtaining the necessities of life.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.