Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 So. 2d 869 - Mister v. State

190 So. 2d 869 - Mister v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2019

18 state decisions

50196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cole v. State · Spears v. State · Conway v. State · 52 So. 2d 910 - Pafford v. Standard Life Ins. Co. of Indiana · Williams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`This Court has adopted a rule that a defendant can be convicted on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice, but it has carefully restricted the scope of that doctrine by holding that such uncorroborated testimony should be viewed with great caution and suspicion, and that it must be reasonable and not improbable or self-contradictory, or substantially impeached.'" 190 So.2d at 870 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"The State's case was sufficient to survive defendant's request for a peremptory instruction, but under all the circumstances, the verdict is against the great weight of the evidence. The motion for a new trial should have been sustained. Since the evidence of defendant's guilt is of such nature as to create a serious doubt in our minds, we think that another jury should be permitted to pass upon this question. Cole v. State, 217 Miss. 779 , 65 So.2d 262 (1953); Dickerson v. State, 54 So.2d 925 (Miss. 1951); Jefferson v. State, 52 So.2d 925 (Miss. 1951); Conway v. State, 177 Miss. 461 , 171 So. 16 (1936)." 190 So.2d at 871 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “manifestly interested in absolving himself from guilt and putting blame on defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.