Minda v. Minda’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 880 So. 2d 717 - Geer v. Jacobsen · 603 So. 2d 1384 - STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Bailey · 515 So. 2d 1305 - Crocker Investments, Inc. v. Statesman Life Insurance Co. · In Re Guardianship of Schiavo · 68 So. 3d 979 - Paul v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A second motion for relief from judgment is improper if it attempts to relitigate issues decided by a previous order. However, because the first motion was denied as facially insufficient, none of the former wife's claims were adjudicated on the merits. Accordingly, the second motion was not successive ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.