Contes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 460 So. 2d 1024 - In the Interest of AR · K.W. v. State · 478 So. 2d 872 - C.L.A. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because the evidence failed to establish the fair market value of the property at the time of the offense, [the defendant] can be convicted only of second-degree petit theft.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.