190 So. 3d 806 - State v. Kisack’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Hudson v. Palmer · Coppedge v. United States · Gilliam v. United States · 134 S. Ct. 2473 - Riley v. Cal. United States · 839 So. 2d 1 - State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Accordingly, even if [defendant] was released from federal prison immediately after the sentence was imposed, he would have been on supervised release for three years ..., and the ten year cleansing period would not have been expired when the present offense was committed ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[Defendant] had no reasonable expectation of privacy as to a cell phone hidden in a crevice in the day room wall.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[D]efense counsel's argument at the sentencing hearing constituted an implicit waiver of the delay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.