Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

190 So. 3d 98

Michael Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2015-03-25

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2017

1 state decisions

Relies on Smith v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-03-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Affirmed. . Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant challenging the vol-untariness of his plea through a timely collateral motion. .See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850. 1

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., TAYLOR and. KLINGENSMITH, JJ;, concur.
1

¶2 . We decline to consider the trial court’s order denying appellant's motion to withdraw plea because it was entered after the notice of appeal was filed, at which point the trial court lacked jurisdiction to proceed. Also, no notice of appeal places that order before this court. Smith v. State, 113 So.3d 110, 111 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).

/190/so3d/98 · .json · Public domain