Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 SW 240 - Olsen v. Greele

Olsen v. Greele’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
December 1928
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bracken v. Jones · Church v. Waggoner · 8 Tex. Civ. App. 630 - Puckett v. McDaniel · 44 Tex. Civ. App. 599 - Naylor & Jones v. Foster · Hill v. Howth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But it is also contended on behalf of appellant that the five-year statute of limitation cannot avail in this case, because the undisputed testimony shows that a deed in appellees’ chain of title, executed many years prior to the Allen deeds hereinbefore referred to, and purporting to have been executed under power of attorney from appellant, was a forgery. It is true that the statute relating to five-year limitation declares that ‘no one claiming under a forged deed, or deed executed under a forged power of attorney, shall be allowed the benefits of this article’; but in their plea of five-year limitation appellees did not base their right to such limitation upon the deed charged to be a forgery, but upon deeds executed by the Allens, as hereinbefore stated, and which deeds were free from any suspicion of forgery. We hold that the provision of the statute denying the right to use a forged deed as the basis of the five-year statute of limitation has reference to the deeds relied on in support of that plea, and not to- other deeds, not necessary to support such plea of limitation. Hence we hold that the proviso in the statute referred to has no application to this case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.