Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 VA 116 - Baylor v. Commonwealth

Baylor v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably 47 Va. App. 687 - George M. Epps, Sheriff of City of Petersburg, Virginia v. Commonwealth (2006), Gaskill v. Commonwealth (1965)

25 state decisions

8019491950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gravely v. Deeds · Collins v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"No justice of the peace, police justice, civil and police justice, juvenile and domestic relations court judge or other trial justice shall be competent to testify against the accused in a court of record as to statements made by the accused on his trial by such justice or on his preliminary examination before such justice."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “designed and intended to protect an accused against the testimony of certain judicial officers before whom he has appeared as to admissions or confessions made by him.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““This court has held repeatedly that on appeal from the judgment of a trial justice the case is tried de novo in the circuit or corporation court. The appeal is, in effect, a statutory grant of a new trial. It not only annuls the judgment of the trial justice, but it is reversible error to permit such judgment to be introduced in evidence before the jury. The question on appeal is not whether the judgment, of the justice is correct but whether the accused is guilty of the offenses charged. In determining this issue the judgment of the trial justice is disregarded.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.