190 Wash. 2d 104 - State v. Lopez’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Ornelas v. United States · United States v. Cronic · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Ake v. Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because claims of ineffective assistance of counsel present mixed questions of law and fact, we review them de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Curry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.