190 Wash. 2d 727 - State v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 115 Wash. 2d 171 - City of Spokane v. Douglass · 122 Wash. 2d 109 - State v. Halstien · State v. Armendariz · State v. Thomas · State v. Bahl
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“several conceivable examples where an individual could be convicted of indecent exposure but lack sexual motivation: (1) flashing a passerby for shock value, (2) streaking naked across a school campus, or (3) mooning someone out a window.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[n]othing in the statute or these definitions [of obscene and lascivious] inherently requires that an exposure be committed with a sexual motive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Indecent exposure is not one of the crimes defined as a sex offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.