Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 WIS 97 - Heymann v. Luchsinger

Heymann v. Luchsinger’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
May 1972
most recently cited

1 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 1972

1 district · 10 state decisions

30192619301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Revocation of Ancillary Letters Testamentary of the Estate of Newcomb · Truelsch v. Miller · Frame v. Thormann · Will of Eaton · Minnesota Stoneware Co. v. McCrossen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In what we have said we do not wish to be understood as denying the right of the deceased to freely change his residence at will and for no other reason than to escape taxation in Wisconsin, and the right to choose another residence implies the right to declare his choice even for the sole purpose of making evidence to prove what his choice was. ‘Such declarations are not self-serving in an improper sense, unless they are made with intent to deceive. If they are false and made for a sinister purpose, they will meet the fate that falsehood always meets in courts of justice when discovered by the triers of fact’ Matter of Newcomb, 192 N. Y. 238, 252 , 84 N. E. 950 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . The declarations of the party before, at, and after the time of change of domicile are admissible, as well as all the facts and circumstances gained with such change of domicile. ...” 7”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.