Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 Wis. 2d 170 - Berg v. Schultz

190 Wis. 2d 170 - Berg v. Schultz’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
3
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

2 district · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably 219 Wis. 2d 277 - Doyle v. Engelke (1998), 1325 North Van Buren, LLC v. T-3 Group, Ltd. (2006)

2 district · 29 state decisions

1401994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 119 Wis. 2d 722 - Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co. · 155 Wis. 2d 808 - Smith v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance · 110 Wis. 2d 469 - Bankert Ex Rel. Habush v. Threshermen's Mutual Ins. · 142 Wis. 2d 45 - Paape v. Northern Assurance Co. of America · Sphere Drake Insurance v. Litchfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “focus on the incident or injury that gives rise to the claim, not the plaintiff's theory of liability.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “will pay those sums that the insured becomes legally obligated to pay as damages because of 'bodily injury' or 'property damage' . . . Here, Dimensional claims that the slander of title constitutes "property damage”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “an accident, including continuous or repeated exposure to substantially the same general harmful conditions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.