Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 190 Wis. 2d 65 - State v. Walls

190 Wis. 2d 65 - State v. Walls’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2018

12 state decisions

60199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Staples v. United States · Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Pemberton · 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger · 131 Wis. 2d 153 - State v. Fry · Mularkey v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the weapon is hidden from ordinary observation it is concealed. Absolute invisibility to other persons is not indispensable to concealment. The test is, was it carried so as not to be discernible by ordinary observation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A person is guilty of carrying a concealed deadly weapon when the person carries concealed a deadly weapon upon or about the person without a license to do so as provided by § 1441 of this title....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “What is ordinary observation in such cases cannot well be defined so as to meet all the varying conditions under which weapons may be carried ... but it may be said generally that the meaning is that the weapon must be open to the ordinary observation of persons who may come in contact in the usual and ordinary associations of life with one who carries a weap-on____ If parties approaching a [person], carrying a weapon[,] ... or passing [the person] on the streets or highways, or thrown with [the person] in ordinary social contact, can see the weapon without inspection or examination for that purpose, but from ordinary observation, then such weapon is not concealed ... within the meaning of the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.