Paton v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 1999
3 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Capital Traction Co. v. Hof
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f counsel or a party proceeding pro se fails to appear at a pretrial, settlement, or status conference....” 2 . Although appellant has the right to try h[er] own case ... if [s]he so elects [s]he must not expect or seek concessions because of h[er] inexperience and lack of trial knowledge and training and must, when acting as h[er] own lawyer, be bound by and conform to the rules of court procedure ... equally binding upon members of the bar. Paton v. Rose, 191 A.2d 455 (D.C.1963). 3 . In light of the specific language of the rules (not to mention the scheduling orders referring to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.