Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 A3D 830 - Commonwealth v. Jones

Commonwealth v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Hall · Commonwealth v. Ali · 2009 Pa. Super. 227 - Commonwealth v. Manley · 2014 Pa. Super. 106 - Commonwealth v. Thompson · 2016 Pa. Super. 68 - Commonwealth v. Konias

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As an initial matter, a challenge to the weight of the evidence must be preserved either in a post-sentence motion, by a written motion before sentencing, or orally prior to sentencing. Pa.R.Crim.P. 607(A)(1)-(3). "The purpose of this rule is to make it clear that a challenge to the weight of the evidence must be raised with the trial judge or it will be waived." Comment to Pa.R.Crim.P. 607. If an appellant never gives the trial court the opportunity to provide relief, then there is no discretionary act that this Court can review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.