Napier v. Bertram’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 45 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Jones v. Hyatt Insurance Agency, Inc. (1999), Paradigm Insurance v. Langerman Law Offices, P.A. (2001)
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 45 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McLinn F/v Fjord Johnson F/v Supersonic Churchill v. F/v Fjord F/v Supersonic F/v Supersonic · Hayes v. Continental Insurance · Markowitz v. Arizona Parks Board · Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland · Sellinger v. Freeway Mobile Home Sales, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. A person subject to the requirements of this article shall maintain motor vehicle combined single limit liability insurance as follows: 2. For the transportation of passengers: (a) In a vehicle with a seating capacity of sixteen passengers or more, minimum coverage in the amount of five million dollars and uninsured motorist coverage in the amount of at least three hundred thousand dollars. (b) In a vehicle with a seating capacity of less than sixteen passengers, minimum coverage in the amount of seven hundred fifty thousand dollars and uninsured motorist coverage in the amount of at least three hundred thousand dollars. (c) In a motor vehicle that provides taxicab service, has a seating capacity of less than seven passengers and is not operated on a regular route, minimum coverage in the amount of three hundred thousand dollars and uninsured motorist coverage in the amount of at least three hundred thousand dollars.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“When a legislative provision protects a class of persons by proscribing or requiring certain conduct but does not provide a civil remedy for the violation, the court may, if it determines that the remedy is appropriate in furtherance of the purpose of the legislation and needed to assure the effectiveness of the provision, accord to an injured member of the class a right of action, using a suitable existing tort action or a new cause of action analogous to an existing tort action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“determining whether a statute implicitly creates a private right of action requires considering 'the context of the statutes, the language used, the subject matter, the effects and consequences, and the spirit and purpose of the law.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.