Taylor v. Jarrett’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2024
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kulko v. Superior Court of California in and for City and County of San Francisco · Williams v. State of North Carolina · Estin v. Estin · J.D.S. v. Franks · Auman v. Auman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reveals an absence of jurisdiction,' as an appeal inadequately remedies a trial court's improperly requiring a defense in a matter where it has no jurisdiction.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sigmund v. Rea
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.