Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 Ark. 575 - Duty v. Keith

Duty v. Keith’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
April 2006
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2006

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

4019351940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Craig v. Golden Rule Life Insurance · Coca-Cola Bott. Co. of Ark. v. Coca-Cola Bott. Co. · Cashion v. Parr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““To abrogate or modify a prior contract it is necessary that the minds of the parties meet by an offer and acceptance of the new term. Conduct which is not necessarily inconsistent with the’ continuation of a contract will not be regarded as showing an implied agreement to discharge it, although such conduct might have been consistent with an agreement to discharge such prior contract. Page on Contracts, vol. 4, § 2458.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.