Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 Ark. 963 - State v. Hudspeth

State v. Hudspeth’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
4
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably Nelson v. State (2014), Larimore v. State (1997)

2 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

110193519401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Catlett v. Railway Co. · St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Coleman · Adler v. State · Kelley v. State · Hudspeth v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think, however, that the better rule is that, when a judgment has been affirmed by this court, no application for the writ of error coram nobis may be made to the trial court without permission to make such application has been given by this court; and hereafter this rule will be enforced.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.