In Re Olson’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 521 · 28 U.S.C. § 2075
Relies on In Re Spm Manufacturing Corporation · Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Becker · Matter of Executive Office Centers, Inc. · Industrial Financial Corp. v. Falk (In Re Falk) · In Re Odd Lot Trading, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o provision of this title providing for the raising of an issue by a party in interest shall be construed to preclude the court from, sua sponte, taking any action or making any determination necessary or appropriate to enforce or implement court orders or rules, or to prevent an abuse of process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to limit the court's role to the adjudication of disputes regarding transfers of claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no one seriously considered [the TCF] claim to be unsecured”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.