Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 Cal. 601 - Roberts v. Wehmeyer

Roberts v. Wehmeyer’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 2000
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 6 district · 47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2000 · most notably United States v. Robbins (1926), 21 Cal. 2d 145 - Leupe v. Leupe (1942)

8 federal appellate · 6 district · 47 state decisions

270192319301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pereira v. Pereira · Warburton v. White · Brown v. Brown · Beals ex rel. Walker v. Ares · Arnett v. Reade

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Management, Control, and Disposition of Community Property. — The husband has the management and control of the community property, with the like absolute power of disposition, other than testamentary, as he has of his separate estate; provided, however, that he cannot make a gift of such community property, or convey the same without a valuable consideration, unless the wife, in writing, consent- thereto; and provided also, that no sale, conveyance or encumbrance of the furniture, furnishings and fittings of the home, or of the clothing and wearing apparel of the wife or minor children, which is community property, shall be made without the written consent of the wife.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In so far as it relies on Arnett v. Reade, supra, as indicating that a wife has at all times had an interest or estate in the community property, we are constrained to disagree with it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.