People v. James’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 21 Cal. 4th 903 - People v. Falsetta · 45 Cal. 4th 1282 - People v. Story · 77 Cal. App. 4th 1324 - People v. Brown · 77 Cal. App. 4th 410 - People v. Johnson · 104 Cal. App. 4th 893 - People v. Pierce
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the crime of burglary is not a crime of domestic violence on its face, [a] trial court [may] properly [find] that under the facts of the case, the burglary was a qualifying offense allowing the People to seek to present propensity evidence under section [ Evidence Code section] 1109.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Garcia“in a criminal action in which the defendant is accused of an offense involving domestic violence , evidence of the defendant's commission of other domestic violence is not made inadmissible by Section 1101 if the evidence is not inadmissible pursuant to Section 352.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Garcia“'Abuse' means intentionally or recklessly causing or attempting to cause bodily injury, or placing another person in reasonable apprehension of imminent serious bodily injury to himself or herself, or another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Garcia
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.