Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 F.1d 202 - Moss & Co. v. McCarthy

Moss & Co. v. McCarthy’s Empirical Analysis

191 F. 202 · 1911

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
July 1916
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Sawyer · Caroline Dobbins v. City of Los Angeles · Robb v. Connolly · Fitts v. McGhee · Lehigh Nin Manuf'G Co v. Kelly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The threatened invasion or injury to property rights must be an injury which will naturally and necessarily follow the threatened enforcement of the obnoxious ordinance; not a loss, damage, or detriment flowing merely incidentally or consequentially therefrom, through the arrest and prosecution of the party threatened, however irksome or expensive such action may prove.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.