Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 F.1d 257 - State v. Carr

State v. Carr’s Empirical Analysis

191 F. 257 · 1911

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
7
cited 7 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 10 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2009 · most notably Utah Power Light Company v. United States No 202 United States (1917), Cramer v. United States (1923)

25 federal appellate · 10 district · 12 state decisions

1901911192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tilghman v. Proctor · Hardin v. Jordan · Kimberly v. Arms · Knight v. United Land Ass'n · United States v. Beebe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Wlien it (the sovereign) “sues in equity as a private suitor on a cause of action relating to its proprietary interests, it is held to he affected by those •equities which are recognized as fundamental in controversies between private parties. And why should this not be so? It derogates from the dignity and character of the government to suppose that, formed as it is to secure impartial justice between individuals, it may nevertheless, in the conduct of its own affairs, without regard to the principles it represents, perpetrate upon its citizens wrongs which it would promptly condemn if practiced by one of them upon another.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.