Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 F.1d 682 - Chicago & E. R. v. Ponn

Chicago & E. R. v. Ponn’s Empirical Analysis

191 F. 682 · 1911

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
November 2009
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2009

7 federal appellate ·

401911192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grand Trunk Ry Co of Canada v. Ives · William Parsons v. Bedford Breedlove · Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Cox · Washington Co v. McDade · Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf R. R. v. McDade

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The only kind of knowledge which, on the ground of assumption of risk, will bar a recovery is actual knowledge.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.