Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

191 F.2d 154

Docket No. 12991.

Tyrrell v. United States

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1951-08-06

2 counsel of record

Relies on Dohany v. Rogers · Missouri v. Lewis · Augustus Reetz v. People of the State of Michigan

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1951-08-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 1989

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

501951196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Philander Brooks Beadle, Morton L. Silvers, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Chauncey Tramutolo, U.S. Atty., Donald B. Constine, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before MATHEWS, HEALY and BONE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Appellant was indicted for violating 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 462(a). He had a jury trial and was found guilty. Thereupon a judgment was entered sentencing him to be imprisoned for three years. He appealed from that judgment on June 1, 1951. The record on appeal was filed and the appeal was docketed in this court on June 26, 1951. On July 24, 1951, appellant applied to this court for bail pending appeal. No application for bail pending appeal has been made to the court below or a judge thereof. Such an application to the court below or a judge thereof was practicable on June 1, 1951, and at all times thereafter and is still practicable, despite the filing of the record on appeal and the docketing of the appeal in this court. See Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. The application made to this court on July 24, 1951, is therefore denied without prejudice.

/191/f2d/154 · .json · Public domain